Update on the Prosecution Of MMJ Cases
On August 16, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on the ten consolidated case appeals from criminal defendants from California and Washington. The petitioners were allegedly involved in the cultivation and distribution of medical marijuana. While both California and Washington allow the medical use of marijuana, the federal government does not recognize medical marijuana. It treats medical use like any other illegal use of a controlled substance. However, a congressional amendment to a spending bill called the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016 (Section 542) prohibits the Department of Justice (DOJ) from using federal funds to prevent states with medical marijuana laws from “implementing their laws that authorize the use, distribution, possession, or cultivation of medical marijuana.” An identical amendment in a previous appropriations bill has been used to discontinue an injunction. Still, neither the above law nor any similar law has ever been used to stop the DOJ from prosecuting a criminal case involving medical marijuana.
The court rejected the DOJ’s argument that the bill only prohibited them from taking legal action against the state and decided that by prosecuting individuals for state-sanctioned conduct, the DOJ had prevented the state from giving practical effect to its laws. The court remanded the cases to their district courts and ordered that if the DOJ wanted to continue prosecuting them, the defendants were entitled to evidentiary hearings to determine if they strictly complied with state law.
The petitioners argued that implementation “involved all aspects of putting the law into practical effect,” including penalties and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized conduct. Thus, the DOJ should only be able to prosecute an individual when that “person’s activities are clearly outside the scope of a state’s medical marijuana laws.” However, the court ruled that the DOJ only prevents the implementation of state medical marijuana laws when it prosecutes individuals whose conduct is wholly authorized by state law.
It will be exciting to see the results of the defendants’ hearings regarding their compliance with state law. Notably, just how strict is “strict compliance.” Can a marijuana business be prosecuted federally for cultivation and distribution because a manager forgot to wear their state-issued badge to work in the marijuana industry one time and was cited for it? Or will courts require proof of severe violations of state law, such as selling to the black market, before allowing the DOJ to proceed with the case? It will be up to the district courts to interpret how this ruling applies to marijuana businesses and individuals who are charged federally.
If you have been charged with drug crimes in El Paso, Teller, or Douglas County and would like to schedule a free consultation with one of our veteran defense attorneys, contact our office at (719) 328-1616. Our staff will be happy to assist you.
Why the Law Offices Clifton Black, PC?
- Proven Success: Our team has a history of successful outcomes in even the most complicated criminal cases. Trust the expert defense and win a dismissal.
- Client-Focused: We ensure open communication and responsiveness to our clients’ needs, keeping them informed every step of the way.
- Expert Legal Team: Excellent legal representation is built upon years of experience and a deep understanding of Colorado law.
Related Services
Stay Informed
Stay connected with our blog and on Facebook to receive the latest news and insights from the Law Offices of Clifton Black.
